One issue for the House of St. Barnabas has been to ensure that their plans and aspirations have been compatible with charitable law. The building is no longer held by the original unincorporated charity but by the new company. The value of the organisation in terms of its balance sheet is also highly dependent on the intricacies of relatively ancient UK charity law.
A further challenge is the extent to which the organisation still, to a degree, relies on grants and donations as part of the funding mix. Cash flow management has also been a challenge as the business has switched its business model, invested in new plans and started a new life. To support this, the charity was able to secure a loan from Charity Bank in order to help it manage its cash flow more smoothly.
One external risk is the extent to which the new Crossrail development may potentially affect the fabric of the building. As custodians of a grade 1 listed building, the trustees have significant responsibility for its physical condition. Crossrail is a new east-to-west rail link which passes under the centre of London and could feasibly alter the foundations upon which the House is built. This has meant that House of St. Barnabas supporters have had to spend considerable time liaising with the development team and taking steps to mitigate against structural risks.
A further risk for the daily management of the business is the extent to which it relies upon successful partnerships with vulnerable people with complex needs. Homeless people are perceived in different ways within the UK and there can be some communications and reputational risks when working with these types of clients.
One challenge for the organisation has been to attract the right blend of members, finding the right balance between quality and quantity and ensuring that the House of St Barnabas remains distinctive in a crowded market. The House seeks to “establish a new genre of members club for a socially aware and creative generation of people who are looking for a club that they could personally identify with” and this is an unproven model. The House used “empathy mapping” and “member archetypes” to identify three key target markets, profiling the type of customers for whom the House would be attractive and to develop a strategy for developing relationships with these groups.
Finally, as with almost any social enterprise in the UK at the present time, the economic environment remains a considerable risk for the organisation both in terms of the potential for attracting paying customers and the organisations ability to respond to social need.